December 2018: This submission is in response to the ACCC broadband speed claims guidance consultation. Given the nature of our business, it focuses on the aspects that directly drive how consumers compare and choose plans. Visit our government submissions hub for more Finder submissions to government consultations and inquiries.
Questions regarding services provided using fixed wireless networks
2) Do RSPs plan to develop separate retail offerings, in terms of price, data inclusions and advertised speeds, for services provided using fixed wireless networks?
Yes. Given that NBN Co has separate wholesale pricing models for fixed wireless services, we would expect that to be reflected in plans offered to consumers. While the majority of providers in Finder's NBN database have tended to offer similar plans for fixed NBN services regardless of the underlying technology, that hasn't been the case with fixed wireless services, which usually have their own separate names.
3) Should specific labels be developed for plans that are specific to fixed wireless networks, e.g. to better manage consumer expectations when RSPs are marketing fixed wireless specific plans?
Yes. From a consumer perspective, it's helpful to know that a plan is specifically designed for wireless deployment. Wireless plans don't typically offer the same level of speed or data inclusions, and singling out that a plan is built for the wireless network make this clear.
5) Should the Guidance outline a default methodology for testing maximum attainable speeds on fixed wireless connections where this information is not provided by the network operator, e.g. in terms of time of day to test and number of tests to conduct?
Yes - having a clear and representative basis for claimed speeds makes it much easier for consumers to compare and choose, so a default methodology is definitely desirable. As an example, the "typical evening speed" feature of our NBN comparison table has proven popular with our users.
More resources on Finder
More guides on Finder
-
Response to the Consumer Data Right Sectoral Assessment for the Open Finance sector, focusing on non-bank lending
In this submission, we share our response to the Consumer Data Right Sectoral Assessment for the Open Finance sector, focusing on non-bank lending. It includes key datasets of interest and a possible use case.
-
Response to non-bank lending draft designation instrument for the Consumer Data Right
In response to the proposed designation of the non-bank lending sector for inclusion in the CDR, Finder has prepared the following submission. Broadly, Finder welcomes the designation of the non-bank lending sector for inclusion in the CDR as a valuable sector that offers complimentary datasets to the existing banking designation.
-
Submission to CDR Strategic Assessment
In response to proposed to the strategic assessment of the implementation of an economy-wide CDR, Finder has prepared the following submission. In this submission we share our consumer research across the sectors we compare and our views on the relative opportunity that the CDR could bring to each sector.
-
Submission on Crypto asset secondary service providers: Licensing and custody requirements
In response to proposed licensing and custody requirements for crypto asset secondary service providers, Finder has prepared the following submission. Finder has been an active supporter of the smart regulation for the digital asset sector as we believe it will legitimise a sector that is too big to ignore, and that a strong Australian economy post-pandemic will involve the right conditions for the crypto sector to thrive.
-
Submission on the Statutory Review of the Consumer Data Right
In response to the Statutory Review of the Consumer Data Right, Finder prepared the following submission. We continue to believe that the CDR has the potential to empower Australians to take control of their personal data and use this information to make better financial decisions.
-
Submission on version four of the Consumer Data Right Rules amendments
In response to version four of the Consumer Data Right Rules amendments, Finder prepared the following submission.
-
Supplementary submission on Select Committee on Australia as a technology and financial centre – Third Issues Paper (cryptocurrency focus)
In response to the Select Committee on Australia as a technology and financial centre, Finder prepared the following as a supplementary submission to further our original response.
-
Submission to Treasury on the telecommunications sectoral assessment for CDR
In this submission we share our consumer research on the telecommunications sector, our view on the relative priority of the telecommunications sector for the CDR and responses to the questions outlined in the Sectoral Assessment Consultation paper.
-
Submission on version three of the Consumer Data Right Rules amendments
In this submission, we provide input into this consultation on the proposed changes to the Consumer Data Right (CDR) Rules. Finder continues to be very supportive of the CDR, which we believe will empower Australians to take control of their personal data and use this information to make better financial decisions.
-
Submission to the Select Committee on Australia as a technology and financial centre (Third issues paper on cryptocurrency)
Our views on how to make Australia a centre for digital asset innovation
Ask a question